???????????????? ---????????--- From:"krad"<[email protected]>; Date:2014??8??1??(??????) ????3:39 To:"Gleb Smirnoff"<[email protected]>; Cc:"freebsd-current"<[email protected]>;"FreeBSD Questions"<[email protected]>; Subject:Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?
I always found natting in ipfw rather awkward and harder than in pf. Looking at the man page it doesnt seem to have changed. I should probably give it another go though as it has been about 10 years now On 31 July 2014 14:41, Gleb Smirnoff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:02:22PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > D> Without diminishing your efforts so far, what do you think about > D> pitching all efforts into IPFW to combine effort and reduce overhead of > D> maintaining separate firewalls in the core? Is there an advantage to > D> having our own pf? > > Is there any disadvantage keeping it? It is a plugin. It is optional > and loadable. I removed most additions to the network stack that live > outside netpfil/pf. > > Some people like it and use it. > > It is also the only tool to configure ALTQ now. > > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > [email protected]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
