August 26 2014 2:49 PM, "Garrett Cooper" <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why not just require ksh93 from ports? >
Because zfsd is going to be in base, not in ports. Everything in base needs to work without any ports requirements. Also ksh93 has been... problematic. It has a history of breaking on i386, sparc64, current, etc. It's not exactly a reliable dependency. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
