August 26 2014 2:49 PM, "Garrett Cooper" <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>
> Why not just require ksh93 from ports?
> 

Because zfsd is going to be in base, not in ports. Everything in base needs to 
work without any ports requirements. Also ksh93 has been... problematic. It has 
a history of breaking on i386, sparc64, current, etc. It's not exactly a 
reliable dependency.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to