On Oct 18, 2014 3:54 AM, "Mark Martinec" <mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si> wrote: > > If the purpose of having a none cipher is to have a fast > file transfer, then one should be using sysutils/bbcp > for that purposes. Uses ssd for authentication, and > opens unencrypted channel(s) for the actual data transfer. > It's also very fast, can use multiple TCP streams.
That's an interesting alternative to rsync, scp, and ftp, but doesn't help with zfs send/recv which is where the none cipher really shines. Without the none cipher, SSH becomes the bottleneck limiting transfers to around 400 Mbps on a gigabit LAN. With the none cipher, the network becomes the bottleneck limiting transfers to around 920 Mbps on the same gigabit LAN. This is between two 8-core AMD Opteron 6200 systems using igb(4) NICs. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
