On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Hartland wrote: > > On 04/09/2014 09:49, Borja Marcos wrote: >> On Jun 30, 2014, at 8:02 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >> >>> I think these sound fine, but I've cc'd Xin Li (delphij@) who has worked >>> with >>> folks at Emulex to maintain this driver. He is probably the best person to >>> review this. >> Hi, >> >> Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline now, but as far as I know none of these fixes >> have been applied to -STABLE. Any chances to do it yet? As far as I know, >> the "oce" driver is currently unusable in -STABLE. I managed to cause a >> panic reliably within 30 seconds. > > Was there any conclusion to this, current and releng/10.0 & releng/10.1 seem > pretty similar with regards oce but a customer is reporting panics very > similar to this thread. > > Did the commit of the additional locking never make it in?
Not as far as I know. I´ve updated a couple of machines here to 10-STABLE and I've been applying the patch manually myself. I don't think it's been applied even to -HEAD. For now I've told my coworkers to avoid Emulex cards whenever possible. As far as I know the driver is unusable in its present state. Borja. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
