In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Forrest Aldrich writes: >I've been curious about this. Would someone clarify what in this >license prevents FreeBSD from including it, at some level? People wouldn't be able to use FreeBSD without giving away their source. /etc/passwd is stored in a db file for instance. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Peter Wemm
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Dan Nelson
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Brad Knowles
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Julian Elischer
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.... Thomas David Rivers
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.... Garrett Wollman
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.... Forrest Aldrich
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.... Julian Elischer
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.... Brad Knowles
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Brad Knowles
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Nate Williams
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? David Scheidt
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Sheldon Hearn
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Garance A Drosihn
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Danny J. Zerkel
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? David O'Brien
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Vallo Kallaste
- Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Richard Todd