> Hi,
> 
> I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for tha=
> t I
> want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the old =
.................................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> make
> =66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th.
> 
> Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10.
> FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installation.
> 
> Best regards,
> Bapt

I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to
remove old make without notice ?

In FreeBSD-9.3 :
  bmake is not default, merely there
        -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  518032 Nov  5 16:58 /usr/bin/bmake*
        -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  453176 Nov  5 16:58 /usr/bin/make*
  & man make has No Warning people should migrate to bmake.

FreeBSD-10.0
  Has Only one /usr/bin/*make (& no make.old)
  & No warning that it's a new make called bmake or what if any differences
  might be from make in 9.

cd ~ ; find . -type f -name Makefile | wc -l    # 739

Use of FreeBSD is not merely to rebuild FreeBSD, but to support users who
want to trust FreeBSD to provide predictable functional stability.

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com
 Indent previous with "> ".  Interleave reply paragraphs like a play script.
 Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to