Just curious, but wouldn't this be FreeSVR4??? :-)
=================================================================
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around. |
| Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 |
| and student at The | AIM: muythaibxr |
| The University of Maryland, | Website: (Under Construction) |
| College Park. | http://www.wam.umd.edu/~culverk/|
=================================================================
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Tony Finch wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, 7 May 2000, Doug Barton wrote:
> >
> >> I'm going to reply to the system part of this too, replies to this
> >> thread should split off to -current. I have a design in mind for a new
> >> rc system that uses scripts with "start, stop, status" operators to both
> >> upgrade and downgrade services, where "services" are defined as groups
> >> of daemons/programs that work together. For example, "nfs" would be an
> >> example of a service, which would be subdivided into client and server,
> >> etc.
> >
> >Eivind Eklund made a prototype some time back which addressed this issue -
> >you'd do well to take a look at that one first before reinventing the
> >wheel :)
>
> Or you could use the system that NetBSD already has working.
>
> Tony.
> --
> f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 381 plastic fruit for a starving nation
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
