On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 01:36:03PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > Not necessarily, and certainly not in the very beginning. I remember > a number of times seeing a third-party software vendor who provided > their product in that form, just as many third-party vendors now ship > *.rpm files (and always shipped SCO and Solaris ``packages''). Yes. But with the Ports Collection being the biggest consumer of pkg_*, there is more pkg_* clue on [EMAIL PROTECTED] than [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- a better idea for package dependencies Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: a better idea for package dependencies Kris Kennaway
- Re: a better idea for package dependencies Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: a better idea for package dependencies Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: a better idea for package dependencies David O'Brien
- Re: a better idea for package dependenci... Adam
- Re: a better idea for package depend... David O'Brien
- Re: a better idea for package d... Garrett Wollman
- Re: a better idea for packa... David O'Brien
- Re: a better idea for package d... Adam
- Re: a better idea for packa... David O'Brien
- Re: a better idea for p... Adam
- Re: a better idea for p... David O'Brien
- Re: a better idea for package d... Nik Clayton
- Re: a better idea for package dependenci... Chuck Robey