In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Manfred Antar writes:

>>--- vfs_subr.c~ Sat May  6 00:08:38 2000
>>+++ vfs_subr.c  Sat May 13 21:47:08 2000
>>@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@
>>                 return (error);
>>         }
>>         vp = nvp;
>>-       vp->v_type = VBLK;
>>+       vp->v_type = VCHR;
>>         addalias(vp, dev);
>>         *vpp = vp;
>>         return (0);
>That works for me too .

Yes, that looks correct.

>Which is the correct dev  /dev/da0a , /dev/rda0a , or /dev/da0s1a to use
>rda0a won't work. da0a works fine and I got rid of all the da0s1a,b,e,f,g ones ?

In all likelyhood /dev/da0s1a is the one you should use.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to