Ah, ok, I see now. It's been broken and still broken in 9.x/10.x, already fixed in trunk and I been just reading wrong manpage. Thanks for the pointer, on a related note those fixes should probably be MFCed into 10.3 if it has not been already.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:52:05PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > > Maxim Sobolev <sobo...@freebsd.org> writes: > > > Hi, while working on some unrelated feature I've noticed that at least > > > those two system calls are not returning proper value (-1) on error. > > > Instead actual errno value is returned from the syscall verbatim, > > > i.e. posix_fadvise() returns 22 on EINVAL. > > > > That's how syscalls work. > > No, this is not how typical syscalls work, but is how the posix_fallocate() > and posix_fadvise() are specified by Posix. The patch is wrong, see also > r261080 and r288640. > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
