"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who > recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything. > Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to > change. :) OCVS? (Or was it OVCS? I can never recall...) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows works, for sufficently small values of "works". To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Soren Schmidt
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Brad Knowles
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Dan Papasian
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Brad Knowles
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Mark Murray
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Brad Knowles
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Chuck Robey
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Adam
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Marc van Woerkom
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilizatio... Dave Glowacki
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP ... Thomas David Rivers
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to ... Brian Somers
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... Nick Hibma
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... Mike Meyer
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP development Nik Clayton
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... John Baldwin
- Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP developm... Jason Evans