On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > This is the direction I'd been thinking. FWIW, the usecase is more that > once you've moved away from the struct it's easy to make incremental > changes then to use a 32-bit mountd on a 64-bit kernel. Moving toward > size-independent interfaces helps both causes though. > > -- Brooks > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature) Brooks, What is the benefit or usecase for running a 32 bit mountd on a 64 bit kernel? -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
- which way to update export_args structure? Rick Macklem
- Re: which way to update export_args structure? Rick Macklem
- Re: which way to update export_args structure? Gary Jennejohn
- Re: which way to update export_args structure? Rick Macklem
- Re: which way to update export_args structure? Brooks Davis
- Re: which way to update export_args structure? Rick Macklem
- Re: which way to update export_args structure? Rick Macklem
- Re: which way to update export_args structur... Brooks Davis
- Re: which way to update export_args stru... Josh Paetzel
- Re: which way to update export_args... Brooks Davis
- Re: which way to update export_args... Enji Cooper
- Re: which way to update export_args stru... Rick Macklem
- Re: which way to update export_args... Rick Macklem
- Re: which way to update export_... Brooks Davis
- Re: which way to update export_args stru... John-Mark Gurney