On 12/08/2019 13:57, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 12/08/2019 13:45, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:46:29AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> I guess that there is more than one way to achieve what I want or >>> something similar to that. >>> Rather than "expend words" on a theoretical discussion, I decided to do >>> this: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21221 >>> However, I am still open to the discussion and suggestions. >>> One thing that I would prefer, though, is to make the watchdogd service >>> as smart as possible -- but not smarter :-) -- that is, I would prefer >>> to do without adding any new command verbs to it. >> >> Did you considered exporting kern_shutdown.c:rebooting as a sysctl ? > > No, I didn't it. Thank you for the suggestion. > Let me investigate it.
'rebooting' seems to be too late, it's set when the actual reboot system call is made. rc.shutdown is run before that. I think that the kernel is generally[*] not aware of an imminent shutdown between the time init(8) is signaled and the time init(8) calls reboot(2). [*] -- except for cases where the kernel is an initiator of the shutdown. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
