Hi, On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:59:15PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 2:19 PM tech-lists <tech-li...@zyxst.net> wrote:As subject - what will there be in base to interact with the new git repo? I mean, right now, for svn there is svnlite. What for git?'pkg add git' is your choice now.Shouldn't it be in base before the move to git?We will have got (from OpenBSD: Game Of Trees) in the future. It isn'tquite there yet, however, so it's not in base.
Do you agree that this situation is a bad look for an *operating system* ? Having to depend on a third-party tool to stay up-to-date and secure.In multiple locations it is said that installing a port is *at your own risk*. Personally, I'd like the official updating tool to have had the same level of analysis (and so the same level of "risk") on it as the base OS, (and also be under the same licence).
I mean, shouldn't all the basic tools be present in an OS, at least in order to update it? And *then* migrate to the update method?
When we migrated from CVS to Subversion, we didn't grow svnlite in the base for many months after the conversion.
A mistake then and a mistake now with svn to git IMO. -- J.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
