On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:28 AM Glen Barber <g...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 05:26:50PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:11:48AM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: > > > Is it possible to build multiple different kernels and include them > all in > > > a release image? release.conf says so. But from experiment, what I > see is > > > that: > > > > > > * release.sh does pass both kernels in the KERNCONF variable to "make > > > buildkernel" > > > * "make buildkernel" dutifully builds both > > > * BUT, "make installkernel" only installs the first kernel and ignores > the > > > rest > > > * Only the first kernel ends up in the final image > > > * It's not really clear where an alternate kernel should go, anyway. > > > Probably someplace like /boot/kernel.debug , but release.conf doesn't > > > provide a way to specify that. > > > > > > So is the "multiple kernels in release.conf" feature unfinished? If > so, > > > does anybody have a good idea about the best way to finish it? > > > > > > > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/blob/7045b1603bdf054145dd958a4acc17b410fb62a0/release/release.conf.sample#L32 > > > > > > > Last I was aware, based on a patch sent to me privately, I believe, it > > should work. > > > > Let me take a look. > > > > Oh, wait. Are you using 'make release' or release/release.sh? > > Glen > I'm using release.sh. I thought that was just a wrapper for "make release".
