On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:14:24 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev <da...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 09:14:27AM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 07:11:28 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > ... > > > Oh, you know, it's about steadily deteriorating quality of our gfx > > > stack once we had started pulling things from Linux. > > > > Right. > > That just proves that you know nothing and will just complain on > > everything "new". > > I know that I had problemless desktop some 10-5 years ago, okayish > desktop ~three years ago, tolerable experience with 4.16.x DRM bits > and shitty one with current 5.4.x (FWIW, 5.x had been problematic > for me since the beginning, but previously it was fairly easy to > build drm-fbsd12.0-kmod on -CURRENT to avoid regressions, now the > source bases had divered too far enough; it's probably still possible > to patch, but would take longer time). Any PR open for your issues ? > > We've *always* pulled drm bits from Linux, always. > > You know what I've meant. I do because I know the history, not everyone does. > > > In FreeBSD chat and with less biased poll than the one Warner had posted > > > on Twitter, most people had actually voted against making it off by > > > default: https://t.me/FreeBSD1/25129. > > > > So nothing changes then? > > How do you mean? Most FreeBSD people, not some random Twitter crowd, want > the bell to be on by default, but it's still off. > > ./danfe > Sorry I didn't see the "against". Well this telegram chat is still a community one, I don't see how it makes a difference. Also I can't see the poll result. -- Emmanuel Vadot <m...@bidouilliste.com> <m...@freebsd.org>
