Le 20.12.2021 16:48, Steve Kargl a écrit : > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:15:53AM +0100, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > > > I assume what Steve is talking about is the corresponding value in > > decimal of the number of ULP. > > > > Bad assumption. Please read Goldberg's paper. I am talking > about ULP in the underlying floating point format. >
Thanks, it's more clear now: it's the ULP value. Is your tlibm_libm program available for testing ? If I find time I'd like to do some tests. -- Marc