On Aug 23, 2023, at 15:10, Mateusz Guzik <mjgu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 8/23/23, Mark Millard <mark...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> [Forked off the ZFS deadlock 14 discussion, per feedback.]
>> 
>> On Aug 23, 2023, at 11:40, Alexander Motin <m...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 22.08.2023 14:24, Mark Millard wrote:
>>>> Alexander Motin <mav_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote on
>>>> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:18:12 UTC :
>>>>> I am waiting for final test results from George Wilson and then will
>>>>> request quick merge of both to zfs-2.2-release branch. Unfortunately
>>>>> there are still not many reviewers for the PR, since the code is not
>>>>> trivial, but at least with the test reports Brian Behlendorf and Mark
>>>>> Maybee seem to be OK to merge the two PRs into 2.2. If somebody else
>>>>> have tested and/or reviewed the PR, you may comment on it.
>>>> I had written to the list that when I tried to test the system
>>>> doing poudriere builds (initially with your patches) using
>>>> USE_TMPFS=no so that zfs had to deal with all the file I/O, I
>>>> instead got only one builder that ended up active, the others
>>>> never reaching "Builder started":
>>> 
>>>> Top was showing lots of "vlruwk" for the cpdup's. For example:
>>>> . . .
>>>> 362     0 root         40    0  27076Ki   13776Ki CPU19   19   4:23
>>>> 0.00% cpdup -i0 -o ref 32
>>>> 349     0 root         53    0  27076Ki   13776Ki vlruwk  22   4:20
>>>> 0.01% cpdup -i0 -o ref 31
>>>> 328     0 root         68    0  27076Ki   13804Ki vlruwk   8   4:30
>>>> 0.01% cpdup -i0 -o ref 30
>>>> 304     0 root         37    0  27076Ki   13792Ki vlruwk   6   4:18
>>>> 0.01% cpdup -i0 -o ref 29
>>>> 282     0 root         42    0  33220Ki   13956Ki vlruwk   8   4:33
>>>> 0.01% cpdup -i0 -o ref 28
>>>> 242     0 root         56    0  27076Ki   13796Ki vlruwk   4   4:28
>>>> 0.00% cpdup -i0 -o ref 27
>>>> . . .
>>>> But those processes did show CPU?? on occasion, as well as
>>>> *vnode less often. None of the cpdup's was stuck in
>>>> Removing your patches did not change the behavior.
>>> 
>>> Mark, to me "vlruwk" looks like a limit on number of vnodes.  I was not
>>> deep in that area at least recently, so somebody with more experience
>>> there could try to diagnose it.  At very least it does not look related to
>>> the ZIL issue discussed in this thread, at least with the information
>>> provided, so I am not surprised that the mentioned patches do not affect
>>> it.
>> 
>> I did the above intending to test the deadlock in my context but
>> ended up not getting that far when I tried to make zfs handle all
>> the file I/O (USE_TMPFS=no and no other use of tmpfs or the like).
>> 
>> The zfs context is a simple single partition on the boot media. I
>> use ZFS for bectl BE use, not for other typical reasons. The media
>> here is PCIe Optane 1.4T media. The machine is a ThreadRipper
>> 1950X, so first generation. 128 GiBytes of RAM. 491520 MiBytes of
>> swap, also on that Optane.
>> 
>> # uname -apKU
>> FreeBSD amd64-ZFS 14.0-ALPHA2 FreeBSD 14.0-ALPHA2 amd64 1400096 #112
>> main-n264912-b1d3e2b77155-dirty: Sun Aug 20 10:01:48 PDT 2023
>> root@amd64-ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG
>> amd64 amd64 1400096 1400096
>> 
>> The GENERIC-DBG variant of the kernel did not report any issues in
>> earlier testing.
>> 
>> The alter referenced /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/main-amd64-poud-bulk_a was
>> installed from the same build.
>> 
>> # zfs list
>> NAME                                          USED  AVAIL  REFER
>> MOUNTPOINT
>> zoptb                                        79.9G   765G    96K  /zoptb
>> zoptb/BUILDs                                 20.5G   765G  8.29M
>> /usr/obj/BUILDs
>> zoptb/BUILDs/alt-main-amd64-dbg-clang-alt    1.86M   765G  1.86M
>> /usr/obj/BUILDs/alt-main-amd64-dbg-clang-alt
>> zoptb/BUILDs/alt-main-amd64-nodbg-clang-alt  30.2M   765G  30.2M
>> /usr/obj/BUILDs/alt-main-amd64-nodbg-clang-alt
>> zoptb/BUILDs/main-amd64-dbg-clang            9.96G   765G  9.96G
>> /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-dbg-clang
>> zoptb/BUILDs/main-amd64-dbg-gccxtc           38.5M   765G  38.5M
>> /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-dbg-gccxtc
>> zoptb/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang          10.3G   765G  10.3G
>> /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang
>> zoptb/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang-alt      37.2M   765G  37.2M
>> /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-clang-alt
>> zoptb/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-gccxtc         94.6M   765G  94.6M
>> /usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-nodbg-gccxtc
>> zoptb/DESTDIRs                               4.33G   765G   104K
>> /usr/obj/DESTDIRs
>> zoptb/DESTDIRs/main-amd64-poud               2.16G   765G  2.16G
>> /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/main-amd64-poud
>> zoptb/DESTDIRs/main-amd64-poud-bulk_a        2.16G   765G  2.16G
>> /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/main-amd64-poud-bulk_a
>> zoptb/ROOT                                   13.1G   765G    96K  none
>> zoptb/ROOT/build_area_for-main-amd64         5.03G   765G  3.24G  none
>> zoptb/ROOT/main-amd64                        8.04G   765G  3.23G  none
>> zoptb/poudriere                              6.58G   765G   112K
>> /usr/local/poudriere
>> zoptb/poudriere/data                         6.58G   765G   128K
>> /usr/local/poudriere/data
>> zoptb/poudriere/data/.m                       112K   765G   112K
>> /usr/local/poudriere/data/.m
>> zoptb/poudriere/data/cache                   17.4M   765G  17.4M
>> /usr/local/poudriere/data/cache
>> zoptb/poudriere/data/images                    96K   765G    96K
>> /usr/local/poudriere/data/images
>> zoptb/poudriere/data/logs                    2.72G   765G  2.72G
>> /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs
>> zoptb/poudriere/data/packages                3.84G   765G  3.84G
>> /usr/local/poudriere/data/packages
>> zoptb/poudriere/data/wrkdirs                  112K   765G   112K
>> /usr/local/poudriere/data/wrkdirs
>> zoptb/poudriere/jails                          96K   765G    96K
>> /usr/local/poudriere/jails
>> zoptb/poudriere/ports                          96K   765G    96K
>> /usr/local/poudriere/ports
>> zoptb/tmp                                    68.5M   765G  68.5M  /tmp
>> zoptb/usr                                    35.1G   765G    96K  /usr
>> zoptb/usr/13_0R-src                          2.64G   765G  2.64G
>> /usr/13_0R-src
>> zoptb/usr/alt-main-src                         96K   765G    96K
>> /usr/alt-main-src
>> zoptb/usr/home                                181M   765G   181M  /usr/home
>> zoptb/usr/local                              5.08G   765G  5.08G
>> /usr/local
>> zoptb/usr/main-src                            833M   765G   833M
>> /usr/main-src
>> zoptb/usr/ports                              26.4G   765G  26.4G
>> /usr/ports
>> zoptb/usr/src                                  96K   765G    96K  /usr/src
>> zoptb/var                                    52.6M   765G    96K  /var
>> zoptb/var/audit                               356K   765G   356K
>> /var/audit
>> zoptb/var/crash                               128K   765G   128K
>> /var/crash
>> zoptb/var/db                                 49.7M   765G    96K  /var/db
>> zoptb/var/db/pkg                             49.4M   765G  49.4M
>> /var/db/pkg
>> zoptb/var/db/ports                            164K   765G   164K
>> /var/db/ports
>> zoptb/var/log                                1.61M   765G  1.61M  /var/log
>> zoptb/var/mail                                632K   765G   632K  /var/mail
>> zoptb/var/tmp                                 128K   765G   128K  /var/tmp
>> 
>> # poudriere jail -jmain-amd64-bulk_a -i
>> Jail name:         main-amd64-bulk_a
>> Jail version:      14.0-ALPHA2
>> Jail arch:         amd64
>> Jail method:       null
>> Jail mount:        /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/main-amd64-poud-bulk_a
>> Jail fs:
>> Jail updated:      2021-12-04 14:55:22
>> Jail pkgbase:      disabled
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> So, setting up another test with some related information
>> shown before, during, and after. sysctl output is from
>> another ssh session than the bulk -a run.
>> 
>> # sysctl -a | grep vnode
>> kern.maxvnodes: 2213808
>> kern.ipc.umtx_vnode_persistent: 0
>> kern.minvnodes: 553452
>> vm.vnode_pbufs: 2048
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodepgsout: 0
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodepgsin: 272429
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodeout: 0
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodein: 12461
>> vfs.vnode_alloc_sleeps: 0
>> vfs.wantfreevnodes: 553452
>> vfs.freevnodes: 962766
>> vfs.vnodes_created: 2538980
>> vfs.numvnodes: 1056233
>> vfs.cache.debug.vnodes_cel_3_failures: 0
>> vfs.cache.stats.heldvnodes: 91878
>> debug.vnode_domainset: <NULL>
>> debug.sizeof.vnode: 448
>> debug.fail_point.status_fill_kinfo_vnode__random_path: off
>> debug.fail_point.fill_kinfo_vnode__random_path: off
>> 
>> # poudriere bulk -jmain-amd64-bulk_a -a
>> . . .
>> [00:01:34] Building 34042 packages using up to 32 builders
>> [00:01:34] Hit CTRL+t at any time to see build progress and stats
>> [00:01:34] [01] [00:00:00] Builder starting
>> [00:01:57] [01] [00:00:23] Builder started
>> [00:01:57] [01] [00:00:00] Building ports-mgmt/pkg | pkg-1.20.4
>> [00:03:09] [01] [00:01:12] Finished ports-mgmt/pkg | pkg-1.20.4: Success
>> [00:03:22] [01] [00:00:00] Building print/indexinfo | indexinfo-0.3.1
>> [00:03:22] [02] [00:00:00] Builder starting
>> [00:03:22] [03] [00:00:00] Builder starting
>> . . .
>> [00:03:22] [31] [00:00:00] Builder starting
>> [00:03:22] [32] [00:00:00] Builder starting
>> [00:03:31] [01] [00:00:09] Finished print/indexinfo | indexinfo-0.3.1:
>> Success
>> [00:03:31] [01] [00:00:00] Building devel/gettext-runtime |
>> gettext-runtime-0.22
>> . . .
>> 
>> Note that only [01] makes progress: no new "Builder started"
>> notices occur. top shows 31 of the pattern:
>> cpdup -i0 -o ref ??
>> 
>> Then during the 31 cpudup's showing vlruwk most of the time:
>> 
>> # sysctl -a | grep vnode
>> kern.maxvnodes: 2213808
>> kern.ipc.umtx_vnode_persistent: 0
>> kern.minvnodes: 553452
>> vm.vnode_pbufs: 2048
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodepgsout: 22844
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodepgsin: 582398
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodeout: 890
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodein: 34296
>> vfs.vnode_alloc_sleeps: 2994
>> vfs.wantfreevnodes: 553452
>> vfs.freevnodes: 2209662
>> vfs.vnodes_created: 12206299
>> vfs.numvnodes: 2214071
>> vfs.cache.debug.vnodes_cel_3_failures: 0
>> vfs.cache.stats.heldvnodes: 459
>> debug.vnode_domainset: <NULL>
>> debug.sizeof.vnode: 448
>> debug.fail_point.status_fill_kinfo_vnode__random_path: off
>> debug.fail_point.fill_kinfo_vnode__random_path: off
>> 
>> Wait a while but still the mostly cpdup vlruwk status:
>> 
>> # sysctl -a | grep vnode
>> kern.maxvnodes: 2213808
>> kern.ipc.umtx_vnode_persistent: 0
>> kern.minvnodes: 553452
>> vm.vnode_pbufs: 2048
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodepgsout: 22844
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodepgsin: 583527
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodeout: 890
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodein: 34396
>> vfs.vnode_alloc_sleeps: 8053
>> vfs.wantfreevnodes: 553452
>> vfs.freevnodes: 2210166
>> vfs.vnodes_created: 12212061
>> vfs.numvnodes: 2215106
>> vfs.cache.debug.vnodes_cel_3_failures: 0
>> vfs.cache.stats.heldvnodes: 497
>> debug.vnode_domainset: <NULL>
>> debug.sizeof.vnode: 448
>> debug.fail_point.status_fill_kinfo_vnode__random_path: off
>> debug.fail_point.fill_kinfo_vnode__random_path: off
>> 
>> ^C[00:14:55] Error: Signal SIGINT caught, cleaning up and exiting
>> 
>> # sysctl -a | grep vnode
>> kern.maxvnodes: 2213808
>> kern.ipc.umtx_vnode_persistent: 0
>> kern.minvnodes: 553452
>> vm.vnode_pbufs: 2048
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodepgsout: 22844
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodepgsin: 584474
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodeout: 890
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodein: 34591
>> vfs.vnode_alloc_sleeps: 17584
>> vfs.wantfreevnodes: 553452
>> vfs.freevnodes: 2210796
>> vfs.vnodes_created: 12222343
>> vfs.numvnodes: 2216564
>> vfs.cache.debug.vnodes_cel_3_failures: 0
>> vfs.cache.stats.heldvnodes: 539
>> debug.vnode_domainset: <NULL>
>> debug.sizeof.vnode: 448
>> debug.fail_point.status_fill_kinfo_vnode__random_path: off
>> debug.fail_point.fill_kinfo_vnode__random_path: off
>> 
>> [main-amd64-bulk_a-default] [2023-08-23_13h58m08s] [sigint:] Queued: 34435
>> Built: 2     Failed: 0     Skipped: 35    Ignored: 358   Fetched: 0
>> Tobuild: 34040  Time: 00:14:36
>> [00:16:13] Logs:
>> /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/main-amd64-bulk_a-default/2023-08-23_13h58m08s
>> [00:16:49] Cleaning up
>> load: 5.28  cmd: sh 77057 [vlruwk] 141.63r 0.00u 30.98s 28% 6932k
>> #0 0xffffffff80b76ebb at mi_switch+0xbb
>> #1 0xffffffff80bc960f at sleepq_timedwait+0x2f
>> #2 0xffffffff80b76610 at _sleep+0x1d0
>> #3 0xffffffff80c5b2dc at vn_alloc_hard+0x2ac
>> #4 0xffffffff80c50a12 at getnewvnode_reserve+0x92
>> #5 0xffffffff829afb12 at zfs_zget+0x22
>> #6 0xffffffff8299ca8d at zfs_dirent_lookup+0x16d
>> #7 0xffffffff8299cb5f at zfs_dirlook+0x7f
>> #8 0xffffffff829ac410 at zfs_lookup+0x350
>> #9 0xffffffff829a782a at zfs_freebsd_cachedlookup+0x6a
>> #10 0xffffffff80c368ad at vfs_cache_lookup+0xad
>> #11 0xffffffff80c3b6d8 at cache_fplookup_final_modifying+0x188
>> #12 0xffffffff80c38766 at cache_fplookup+0x356
>> #13 0xffffffff80c43fb2 at namei+0x112
>> #14 0xffffffff80c62e5b at kern_funlinkat+0x13b
>> #15 0xffffffff80c62d18 at sys_unlink+0x28
>> #16 0xffffffff83b8e583 at filemon_wrapper_unlink+0x13
>> #17 0xffffffff81049a79 at amd64_syscall+0x109
>> 
>> [00:26:28] Unmounting file systems
>> Exiting with status 1
>> 
>> # sysctl -a | grep vnode
>> kern.maxvnodes: 2213808
>> kern.ipc.umtx_vnode_persistent: 0
>> kern.minvnodes: 553452
>> vm.vnode_pbufs: 2048
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodepgsout: 22844
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodepgsin: 585384
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodeout: 890
>> vm.stats.vm.v_vnodein: 34798
>> vfs.vnode_alloc_sleeps: 27578
>> vfs.wantfreevnodes: 553452
>> vfs.freevnodes: 61362
>> vfs.vnodes_created: 20135479
>> vfs.numvnodes: 59860
>> vfs.cache.debug.vnodes_cel_3_failures: 0
>> vfs.cache.stats.heldvnodes: 208
>> debug.vnode_domainset: <NULL>
>> debug.sizeof.vnode: 448
>> debug.fail_point.status_fill_kinfo_vnode__random_path: off
>> debug.fail_point.fill_kinfo_vnode__random_path: off
>> 
>> 
>> For reference (from after):
>> 
>> # kldstat
>> Id Refs Address                Size Name
>> 1   95 0xffffffff80200000  274b308 kernel
>> 2    1 0xffffffff8294c000   5d5238 zfs.ko
>> 3    1 0xffffffff82f22000     7718 cryptodev.ko
>> 4    1 0xffffffff83b10000     3390 acpi_wmi.ko
>> 5    1 0xffffffff83b14000     3220 intpm.ko
>> 6    1 0xffffffff83b18000     2178 smbus.ko
>> 7    1 0xffffffff83b1b000     2240 cpuctl.ko
>> 8    1 0xffffffff83b1e000     3360 uhid.ko
>> 9    1 0xffffffff83b22000     4364 ums.ko
>> 10    1 0xffffffff83b27000     33c0 usbhid.ko
>> 11    1 0xffffffff83b2b000     3380 hidbus.ko
>> 12    1 0xffffffff83b2f000     4d20 ng_ubt.ko
>> 13    6 0xffffffff83b34000     abb8 netgraph.ko
>> 14    2 0xffffffff83b3f000     a250 ng_hci.ko
>> 15    4 0xffffffff83b4a000     2670 ng_bluetooth.ko
>> 16    1 0xffffffff83b4d000     83a0 uftdi.ko
>> 17    1 0xffffffff83b56000     4e58 ucom.ko
>> 18    1 0xffffffff83b5b000     3360 wmt.ko
>> 19    1 0xffffffff83b5f000     e268 ng_l2cap.ko
>> 20    1 0xffffffff83b6e000    1bf68 ng_btsocket.ko
>> 21    1 0xffffffff83b8a000     38f8 ng_socket.ko
>> 22    1 0xffffffff83b8e000     3250 filemon.ko
>> 23    1 0xffffffff83b92000     4758 nullfs.ko
>> 24    1 0xffffffff83b97000     73c0 linprocfs.ko
>> 25    3 0xffffffff83b9f000     be70 linux_common.ko
>> 26    1 0xffffffff83bab000     3558 fdescfs.ko
>> 27    1 0xffffffff83baf000    31b20 linux.ko
>> 28    1 0xffffffff83be1000    2ed40 linux64.ko
>> 
>> 
>> Note that before the "Cleaning up" notice, the vfs.freevnodes
>> shows as being around (for example) 2210796. But after
>> "Exiting with status": 61362. vfs.vnodes_created has a
>> similar staging of in the ball park of up to 12222343 but
>> then the change to: 20135479. Similarly, vfs.numvnodes
>> 2216564 -> 59860.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Anything else I should gather and report as basic information?
>> 
> 
> This is a known problem, but it is unclear if you should be running
> into it in this setup.

The changed fixed the issue: so I do run into the the issue
for this setup. See below.

> Can you try again but this time *revert*
> 138a5dafba312ff39ce0eefdbe34de95519e600d, like so:
> git revert 138a5dafba312ff39ce0eefdbe34de95519e600d
> 
> may want to switch to a different branch first, for example: git
> checkout -b vfstesting

# git -C /usr/main-src/ diff sys/kern/vfs_subr.c
diff --git a/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c b/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c
index 0f3f00abfd4a..5dff556ac258 100644
--- a/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c
+++ b/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c
@@ -3528,25 +3528,17 @@ vdbatch_process(struct vdbatch *vd)
        MPASS(curthread->td_pinned > 0);
        MPASS(vd->index == VDBATCH_SIZE);
  +       mtx_lock(&vnode_list_mtx);
        critical_enter();
-       if (mtx_trylock(&vnode_list_mtx)) {
-               for (i = 0; i < VDBATCH_SIZE; i++) {
-                       vp = vd->tab[i];
-                       vd->tab[i] = NULL;
-                       TAILQ_REMOVE(&vnode_list, vp, v_vnodelist);
-                       TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&vnode_list, vp, v_vnodelist);
-                       MPASS(vp->v_dbatchcpu != NOCPU);
-                       vp->v_dbatchcpu = NOCPU;
-               }
-               mtx_unlock(&vnode_list_mtx);
-       } else {
-               for (i = 0; i < VDBATCH_SIZE; i++) {
-                       vp = vd->tab[i];
-                       vd->tab[i] = NULL;
-                       MPASS(vp->v_dbatchcpu != NOCPU);
-                       vp->v_dbatchcpu = NOCPU;
-               }
+       for (i = 0; i < VDBATCH_SIZE; i++) {
+               vp = vd->tab[i];
+               TAILQ_REMOVE(&vnode_list, vp, v_vnodelist);
+               TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&vnode_list, vp, v_vnodelist);
+               MPASS(vp->v_dbatchcpu != NOCPU);
+               vp->v_dbatchcpu = NOCPU;
        }
+       mtx_unlock(&vnode_list_mtx);
+       bzero(vd->tab, sizeof(vd->tab));
        vd->index = 0;
        critical_exit();
 }

Still with:

# grep USE_TMPFS= /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf
# EXAMPLE: USE_TMPFS="wrkdir data"
#USE_TMPFS=all
#USE_TMPFS="data"
USE_TMPFS=no


That allowed the other builders to eventually reach "Builder started"
and later activity, [00:05:50] [27] [00:02:29] Builder started
being the first non-[01] to do so, no vlruwk's observed in what
I saw in top:

# poudriere bulk -jmain-amd64-bulk_a -a
. . .
[00:01:34] Building 34042 packages using up to 32 builders
[00:01:34] Hit CTRL+t at any time to see build progress and stats
[00:01:34] [01] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:01:57] [01] [00:00:23] Builder started
[00:01:57] [01] [00:00:00] Building ports-mgmt/pkg | pkg-1.20.4
[00:03:08] [01] [00:01:11] Finished ports-mgmt/pkg | pkg-1.20.4: Success
[00:03:21] [01] [00:00:00] Building print/indexinfo | indexinfo-0.3.1
[00:03:21] [02] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [03] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [04] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [05] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [06] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [07] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [08] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [09] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [10] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [11] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [12] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [13] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [14] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [15] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [16] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [17] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [18] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [19] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [20] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [21] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [22] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [23] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [24] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [25] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [26] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [27] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [28] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [29] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [30] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [31] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:21] [32] [00:00:00] Builder starting
[00:03:29] [01] [00:00:08] Finished print/indexinfo | indexinfo-0.3.1: Success
[00:03:30] [01] [00:00:00] Building devel/gettext-runtime | gettext-runtime-0.22
[00:04:49] [01] [00:01:19] Finished devel/gettext-runtime | 
gettext-runtime-0.22: Success
[00:04:52] [01] [00:00:00] Building devel/gmake | gmake-4.3_2
[00:05:20] [01] [00:00:28] Finished devel/gmake | gmake-4.3_2: Success
[00:05:23] [01] [00:00:00] Building devel/libtextstyle | libtextstyle-0.22
[00:05:50] [27] [00:02:29] Builder started
[00:05:50] [27] [00:00:00] Building devel/npth | npth-1.6
[00:05:50] [08] [00:02:29] Builder started
[00:05:50] [08] [00:00:00] Building devel/boost-jam | boost-jam-1.82.0
[00:05:51] [16] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [16] [00:00:00] Building devel/libdaemon | libdaemon-0.14_1
[00:05:51] [19] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [19] [00:00:00] Building graphics/libpotrace | libpotrace-1.16
[00:05:51] [14] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [14] [00:00:00] Building sysutils/gnome_subr | gnome_subr-1.0
[00:05:51] [17] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [17] [00:00:00] Building misc/hicolor-icon-theme | 
hicolor-icon-theme-0.17
[00:05:51] [26] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [26] [00:00:00] Building devel/libinotify | libinotify-20211018
[00:05:51] [12] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [12] [00:00:00] Building devel/evdev-proto | evdev-proto-5.8
[00:05:51] [29] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [29] [00:00:00] Building devel/opencl | opencl-3.0.14
[00:05:51] [05] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [05] [00:00:00] Building devel/autoconf-switch | 
autoconf-switch-20220527
[00:05:51] [11] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [11] [00:00:00] Building textproc/html2text | html2text-1.3.2a_1,1
[00:05:51] [25] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [04] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [25] [00:00:00] Building audio/speexdsp | speexdsp-1.2.1
[00:05:51] [04] [00:00:00] Building converters/libiconv | libiconv-1.17
[00:05:51] [22] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [22] [00:00:00] Building dns/public_suffix_list | 
public_suffix_list-20230630
[00:05:51] [20] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [02] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [24] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [31] [00:02:30] Builder started
[00:05:51] [20] [00:00:00] Building print/gsfonts | gsfonts-8.11_8
. . .

I had waited a very long time with no such progress for [02]..[32]
for the prior code.

Now testing for the zfs deadlock issue should be possible for
this setup.

===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com


Reply via email to