>So, who wants to do a proof-of-concept implementation for -current >which integrates with our existing rc.conf mechanism? In order to >obey POLA, we should at least have the separate scripts switch off the >same knobs whenever possible. > >It's something I'd be willing to do, I guess. I have some history >with the rc.foo files. :) I'm rather new to -current, but I'd be willing to be junior hacker on this project. I'm rather fond of shell script hacking and other languages come easily to me too. DocWilco To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Mike Meyer
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Gerhard Sittig
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Mike Meyer
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.fire... Gerhard Sittig
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Nik Clayton
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Warner Losh
- RE: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
- RE: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Andrea Campi
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien