On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 11:58:39PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Makoto MATSUSHITA writes:
> : It does not fix this problem. However, if we separate the execution of
> : "make obj" and "make all", we can avoid (again, not *fix*) the problem.
> : Maybe this change is reasonable; there is few meaning doing "make
> : kernel-depend" in "doMODULES" target.
>
> I think that make has no business doing an implicit make obj for the
> all target.
Someone has to run `make obj' for the modules tree. How are you doing it
locally?
> I have been running with patches in my tree that doesn't do the obj
> target if .depend exists.
can you post them for review.
> Of course, you have to be more careful about running make depend in
> that case
Now *that* sounds scarry to me. We'll have people all over the lists who
forget to and would now get rather bitten. From the sounds of it, your
patch doesn't create as robust a world, but maybe it does.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
