On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 01:44:41PM -0500, Brian Dean wrote: > I think I finally understand what you are complaining about, Maybe. > But to say that installing ports into /usr/local is somehow wrong, I > have to disagree. Do you understand why NetBSD Packages (ie, the system they took from us) install into /usr/pkg by default rather than /usr/local ? -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Andrew Reilly
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Warner Losh
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Nat Lanza
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Joe Kelsey
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Brian Dean
- Re: /usr/local abuse Blaz Zupan
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Wes Peters
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Will Andrews
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Crist J. Clark