On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:18:31PM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > Nope. One can ``ln -s /usr/local /usr/pkg'' and get the behavior those > > that like everything in one place prefers while still segregating stuff > > for those that prefer it. > > That makes no sense. Yes it does. > The big argument has been that packages should not go into /usr/local > because /usr/local is for something else. By one set of people. There is another set that wants everything in a single directory. The NetBSD way gives that to them with a very simple symlink. There is no easy way to split out the FreeBSD _Packages_ from /usr/local, for the converse. > What's the difference? Opinions on wether to separate out or not. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Will Andrews
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Crist J. Clark
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Warner Losh
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Nate Williams
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Brooks Davis
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Matthew Thyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Nate Williams