Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm more concerned with whether it's actually normal for the process > pointer to be NULL in the first place. Is this the case? One example (which I don't know if that what's happening here) is when following symbolic links. namei() calls VOP_READLINK with proc == NULL. > And if so, why is nfs_msg() being called with this pointer being > passed in in the first place? Because the code doesn't check? I thought it was easier to have the check in nfs_msg, but it's only called in two places so doing the check there should also work. /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
