Archie Cobbs wrote:
>
> Rogier R. Mulhuijzen writes:
>
> > Also, a quick question for you netgraph guys. Why is it that ng_one2many
> > send a packet only out of one hook? I can see use for an algorithm that
> > sends packets from the 'one' hook to all the 'many' hooks (that are up) and
> > keep the normal behaviour for many to one.
this would be a REALLY easy node to write...maybe your first?
(see how 'ng_tee' works and ng_one2many, and
write one that does something in between.
--
__--_|\ Julian Elischer
/ \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( OZ ) World tour 2000
---> X_.---._/ from Perth, presently in: Budapest
v
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: status of bridge code Thomas T. Veldhouse
- Re: status of bridge code Julian Elischer
- Re: status of bridge code Archie Cobbs
- Re: status of bridge code Doug White
- Re: status of bridge code Vitaly V. Belekhov
- Re: bw limit in netgraph (Was: status of... Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
- Re: bw limit in netgraph (Was: statu... Archie Cobbs
- Re: status of bridge code Boyd R. Faulkner
- Re: status of bridge code Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
- Re: status of bridge code Archie Cobbs
- Re: status of bridge code Julian Elischer
- Re: status of bridge code Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
- Re: status of bridge code Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
- Re: status of bridge code Archie Cobbs
- Re: status of bridge code Julian Elischer
- Re: status of bridge code Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
- Re: status of bridge code Julian Elischer
- Re: status of bridge code Andrea Campi
- Re: status of bridge code Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
- Re: status of bridge code Andrea Campi
- Re: status of bridge code Julian Elischer
