> Perhaps /etc/shells is the least of all evils here. I think there's way too much paranoia about software systems putting stuff into /etc. It intended to contain host-specific configuration data I think there's value in having this configuration data in one or very few places so you're not chasing stuff all over the file system. I think that /etc/X11 which came along with the XFree86 4 port is a step in the right direction, too. Frankly, I'd rather have an /etc/local than /usr/local/etc for that sort configuration data so that it's in one place, and backed up along with the rest of the hosts's configuration. louie To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- patch for test: /etc/shells -> /usr/local/etc/shells Steve O'Hara-Smith
- patch for test: /etc/shells -> /usr/local/etc/s... Garrett Wollman
- Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -> /usr/loc... Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -> /usr... Louis A. Mamakos
- Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -> ... Mike Meyer
- Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -> /usr... Wes Peters
- RE: patch for test: /etc/shells -> /usr/local/e... John Baldwin
- Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -> /usr/loc... Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -> /usr... John Baldwin
- Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -> ... Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -> ... Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: patch for test: /etc/shel... Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: patch for test: /etc/... Jacques A. Vidrine