On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:31:32 -0500 (EST) Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GW> I would rather have a single file, located in a directory intended for GW> configuration files. Perhaps we could call it ``/etc/shells'' which GW> seems to be popular. As you wish. I have no axe to grind, it was fun and instructive to do, seemed to fit the expressed wishes of some people and I could think of some uses for it. If opinions change you know where to find some code :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch Matt Dillon
- Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch Vadim Belman
- Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support p... sig
- Re: /etc/shells #include syntax suppo... Mike Meyer
- Re: /etc/shells #include syntax ... Sean O'Connell
- Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch Garrett Wollman
- Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch Jacques A. Vidrine
- Steve O'Hara-Smith