On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:44:53PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > "David O'Brien" wrote: > > Actually going from libc.so.500 to libc.so.{x<500} is easy. > > Copy libc.so.500 into /usr/lib/compat. When the libc.so link is made to > > libc.so.{x<500}, that is the lib version number that will get burned into > > objects. After the first `make world', rm /usr/lib/libc.so.500. > > There is no need to rm /usr/lib/libc.so.500 - once a new libc is installed, The need is a clean, uncluttered /usr/lib/ > and the symlink points to it, then libc.so.500 will *never* get linked > against. Yes, I know. :-) But it is true that I didn't state that to make sure others did. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURREN... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... Matt Dillon
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (wa... Matt Dillon
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (wa... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CU... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... Jos Backus
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for ... Alex Zepeda
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad... Daniel Eischen