On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:54:53 +0100, "Leif Neland" wrote: > Do we need a level in between for people who just run current for the > fun of it and for testing. So after the hardcore has tested it in > -current, they commit it to all the monkeys trying to break it, and we > then try it on n^m' combinations of hardware/software. This is a great idea that nobody else has pushed very hard because of resource constraints. :-( Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: HEADS UP: -current world broken since Feb... Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: -current world broken since... David O'Brien
- Re: HEADS UP: -current world broken since... Stephan van Beerschoten
- Do we need a 3. level between stable ... Leif Neland
- RE: Do we need a 3. level between... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Do we need a 3. level be... Dermot McNally
- RE: Do we need a 3. leve... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Do we need a 3. leve... Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: Do we need a 3. level between... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Do we need a 3. level be... Crist J. Clark
- Re: HEADS UP: -current world brok... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: HEADS UP: -current world broken since Feb 10 Warner Losh