> However, a specific hack to cp(1) is what a lot of people don't like. > If FreeBSD contained every little hack every committer had used to > address specific problems, it'd be a mess. I was told that the "hack" everyone is referring to is already implemented in several other operating systems, but I must confess that my searches so far haven't turned up the expected evidence. I did find a rather useful `-u' flag to cp in Redhat 6.2 which FreeBSD could probably stand to adopt, but other than that... I may have to reverse myself on this one if I can't find at least one other vendor which has adopted -t. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary) John W. De Boskey
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary) David O'Brien
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary) Brian Somers
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary) John W. De Boskey
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentar... Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary) Maxim Sobolev
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary) Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary... Brian Somers
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary... Brian Somers
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary... Dima Dorfman
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ comme... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ comme... David O'Brien
- Re: Updated: cp -t patch (w/ commentary) Warner Losh