Hey whatever. Let's just keep a rendered TXT version where it always
(ie. in the src/release... cvs) was but keep the originial as a sgml
version in the doc tree.
Just like ports/INDEX. Only better.
I think it is important to solve the duplication problem we have. It
would be very sad to see a release go out with a wrong X.X-RELEASE
header in the README.TXT file, has it almost happened, if I'm not
mistaken. :)
A.
Leif Neland wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Here's my thoughts...for the record, I'm weakly opposed to regen-ing
> > > *.TXT versions: First, I don't want to bloat the repository with oodles
> > > of builds to the *.TXT files. If we do this, it ought to be be fairly
> > > infrequently, like maybe once or twice a month.
> >
> > Bad idea..
> >
> > RELNOTES, HARDWARE etc are things that should be up to date. Not
> > 'a bit uptodate' or 'slightly outdated'.
> >
> > I really would not like to see the idea being bloated by going this route.
> >
> As UPDATING may contain information nessecary to run make world, it can't be built
>by make world.
> Chicken and egg, methinks...
>
> Leif
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--
La sémantique est la gravité de l'abstraction.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message