In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're not tying up an interrupt; PCI interrupts are shared. With the
> new PCI code, even if you turn it off, we'll just turn it right back on
> again. 8)
But if IRQ 5 is assigned to the uhci device, then it's not available
for use by an ISA device, is it? Or am I all mixed up?
> The problem appears to be a bug in the UHCI driver.
Could be, and I certainly don't know much about this code. But
it seems like the driver is being given reason to assume it has a
working device when it doesn't really have one. I assume the device
is unusable without its interrupt, so shouldn't it fail at probe or
attach time?
John
--
John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA
"Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
