> I actually wrote a short program that emulates *all* of mount_mfs's > umpteen options with md, disklabel, and newfs, but nobody seemed > interested. My choice of name (mount_md) wasn't particuarly good, > either. Look at the -hackers and cvs-all archives around late January > and early February for the discussions. I still have that program, and > it works great, so perhaps I should make it a port (comments?). Why can't that program _replace_ mount_mfs? And assume the name too? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Kris Kennaway
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Mikhail Teterin
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Kris Kennaway
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Dima Dorfman
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Kris Kennaway
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Mikhail Teterin
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Mikhail Teterin
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Kris Kennaway
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Dima Dorfman
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Doug Barton
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Jesper Skriver
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Dima Dorfman
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs) Alexander Leidinger