On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 12:00:55 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:16:12AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > <<On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 03:19:32 -0700, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > Personally, I think it's worth it to get rid of a GNU dependency in > > > the base system, as well as reducing the overall amount of functional > > > code duplication. > > > > I don't, particularly since the two programs which use it are already > > GNU software, so you haven't actually bought any additional freedom by > > making such a change. > > A third is vinum, which buys some additional freedom :-) So lets use it for vinum only leaving gnu soft bug-to-bug compatible with itself. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/
- libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline David Malone
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garrett Wollman
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garance A Drosihn
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Garance A Drosihn
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Kris Kennaway
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Andrey A. Chernov
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Maxim Sobolev
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Maxim Sobolev
- Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Terry Lambert