I havn't checked, but I'll probably do that soon.
Ken
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
>
> > Well, I could do that, but I'd rather write a complete driver with all the
> > regular interfaces... (open, close, ioctl, and a specific major/minor in
> > the kernel, I'm going to add other chips to this driver eventually) The
> > way you are suggesting just opens /dev/io and uses inb and outb to do some
> > hacking around I believe.
>
> You are absolutely correct. I was not suggesting this as the proper
> approach, but as a throw-away checkpoint only (the mapping registers
> seemed inconsistent between OS/motherboard combinations). I suppose
> 0x70 is for HWMon and 0x90 is for the SMBus function, in Via 686B.
>
> Have you checked NetBSD, the seem to have a framework for temperature
> alarms etc.
>
>
> Juha
>
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
