> I suppose I could volunteer for this. I've been dissecting the loader for > months now and hitting the 4th "fence" has been bothersome.. As far as > braving those pesky naysayers, I thought about doing it on my own anyway so > if no one wants the change, I'll just keep it for my own systems. =) > > If nothing else, I'm very curious to see how small I can get a Scheme > implementation.. I'd at least be curious to see how small the alternatives are. I'm not enormously keen to migrate since the .4th support code we have is fairly comprehensive, but it would be foolish to ignore the options. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT US... Jordan Hubbard
- Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT US... Jim Bryant
- Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT US... Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT US... Jonathan Lemon
- Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT US... Bakul Shah
- Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT US... Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT US... Mike Smith
- Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT US... FreeBSD Fanatic
- Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT US... FreeBSD Fanatic
- Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT US... Makoto MATSUSHITA
- Mike Smith