On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 08:24:57AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 19-Oct-01 Chad David wrote:
> > I posted a bug report and patch in kern/29104 and Dima Dorfman also mentioned
> > this in July/August, but it still has not been resolved. The method of
> > triggering it that I detailed in my bug report no longer seems to work,
> > but I've managed to create another one.
> >
> ># mdconfig -a -t swap -s 32m -u 10
> ># disklabel -r -w md10 auto
> ># disklabel -e md10e (copy c to e and set type to 4.2BSD)
> ># ls -l /dev/md10*
> > crw-r----- 1 root operator 95, 0x00010052 Oct 19 01:50 /dev/md10
> > crw-r----- 1 root operator 95, 82 Oct 19 02:00 /dev/md10c
> > crw-r----- 1 root operator 95, 84 Oct 19 01:55 /dev/md10ec
> > crw------- 1 root wheel 95, 0xffff00ff Oct 19 01:50 /dev/mdctl
>
> Well, you are supposed to be running disklabel -e on md10, not md10e. You edit
> the disklabel on a disk or slice, not the disklabel from inside of a partition
> defined by that disklabel. Make sense? :) Disklabel should probably fail to
> actually run in this case since md10e doesn't exist and certainly wouldn't have
> a valid disklabel to edit if it did exist.
Yes, that does make sense. Thank you. In normal cases disklabel would
have failed, but the (md) disk clone code seems to (incorrectly) create
it on the fly. Even an ls /dev/md10e would create the file. The problem
is that ls -l md10eeec returns
crw-r----- 1 root operator 95, 20 Oct 19 02:19 /dev/md2eeec
which I'm guessing is a bad device name :).
Since phk has indicated where the real problem is I will see if I can
track it down and provide a patch.
Thanks.
--
Chad David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACNS Inc. Calgary, Alberta Canada
"When Linux was first ported to the Furby platform,
it suffered from significant stability and performance
problems, which gave the Furby an unfortunate reputation
as being unsuitable for enterprise-level computing."
-- furbeowulf site
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
