On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Peter Wemm wrote: > Mark Murray wrote: > > Hi > > > > Now that I have your attention, please listen up, this may have some > > far-reaching consequences. > > > > We currently have 2 telnet sources in the src/ tree; src/crypto/telnet > > and the "base" telnet spread around in (src/*/*telnet*/). > > > > The "base" telnet is a complete subset of src/crypto telnet, and as > > a consequence of this, I want to remove the base telnet bits from > > the src/ tree. (Just the source, not the build infrastructure). > > > > This will be accomplished by removing the "base" sources, and building > > telnet without defining the AUTHENTICATION and ENCRYPTION macros. These > > macros are currently used with unifdef to make (by hand) the "base" > > telnet stuff). > > > > I'm not sure when I'll make the commit, but it will be soonish, with > > due fanfare. > > > > Those of you who believe that you may be in trouble with your > > government by having crypto in your posession (as opposed to using > > it), please let me know ASAP! This will make src/crypto mandatory > > if you want telnet(d). This will _not_ make crypto _use_ mandatory. > > I for one will miss it. I used libexec/telnetd extensively during ia64 > bootstrap (and still use it) before we had the crypto stuff going. This > was all built by hand, 'make world' still isn't an option there. I also > use usr.bin/telnet on other systems where SRA is constantly getting in > my face and annoying the !^@#%!@^#!# out of me.
I agree. SRA is really annoying. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
