On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 14:06, Søren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Scott Long wrote: > > > As I have stated several times, I have no problem with ATAPI being > > > sent through CAM as long as the usual way stays (some of us cannot > > > afford the weight of those extra layers, nor loose functionality). > > > I'd do the integration somewhat differently to even further minimise > > > the diffs, but that is really not the issue here... > > > So if we can get *serious* commitment from a committer to take up > > > these loose ends, lets talk about what to do, if not my offer stands :) > > > > I'll raise my hand here. I've been keenly interested in this for a > > while, since it will make my UDF work much simpler. I'm also getting my > > Hmm, your UDF code should know nothing about the lower layers, but > we've been over that already :) >
Yes, and hopefully the filesystem won't have to care, but tools like newfs_udf will. > > feet wet in CAM, and I have the two CAM gurus nearby if things get too > > hairy. I fully indend for this to be a cooperative effort with Thomas; > > I'm mainly raising my hand to take the abuse that will no doubt happen > > once in a while. > > Sure, maybe we should make Thomas a committer so he could look after > it himself ? Interested ? Got the time ? I'm all ears for volounteers... > Ummm, I'm volunteering to shepherd these initiatives. The thought of making Thomas a committer had crossed my mind, but I hadn't brought it up with anyone yet. If you're not comfortable with me volunteering for this, please say so. Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
