Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Then I'm back to my original point. I think that breaking binary > > compatibility for all 4.x pam applications is a very bad idea. > It was already broken. There's nothing you can do about it.
Hmm, let me amend this: it's broken for you because you have a pre- OpenPAM libpam + modules that was built on 5.0. You wouldn't see this if you'd upgraded straight from 4.x, because OpenPAM uses versioned modules and doesn't clobber your old 4.x modules. I asked David to put libpam and the PAM modules in COMPAT4X, but never heard back from him. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
