On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:06:08PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:55:18PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > In general, though, the answer is that "3.1 sucks and 2.9x > > > does not". 8-). > > > > Feh. 3.1's optimizer is less buggy in my experience. > > > > > Use at least GCC 3.2, if you feel compelled to use a buggy > > > non-maintenance release level GCC; alternately, wait for 3.3. > > > > What in the world are you trying to say?? > > "non-maintenance release"??? Why do you think 3.2 is buggy?? > > Because rather than leaving it alone for a while, they are already > planning a 3.3. 8-). > > And comments on this list to that effect.
I don't follow. The GCC group branches previous to a release and makes an initial + point releases from it. How is this different from FreeBSD? (other than they branch much before the .0 release and we don't). To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
