Kris Kennaway wrote: > Yes, because as it stands this function is supplied by gcc as a > built-in function, and the source tree will not compile without it > (e.g. with a non-gcc compiler). > > > Alternately, the use could avoid adding the "-fno-builtin", and > > the problem would go away. > > -fno-builtin tells gcc to stop using its own builtin functions and use > the FreeBSD version instead. We don't built with it by default, but > we probably should.
It's a good idea. See other posting though... I think the problem is that sources are being converted to assume C99 compliance, when FreeBSD is, in fact, not compliant. It would be better if this were a compliance complaint, rather than a "-fno-builtin"; it would be best to tackle all these issues at once, rather than one at a time over a very long time. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
