On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:17:53 +1100 (EST)
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My times are with some small improvements which I think don't affect
> the tests much (they affect latency more than throughput).  With lots
> of small files (smaller than the block size), clustering doesn't makes
> even less difference; however, msdosfs doesn't support soft updates
> or async mounts so it it is about as slow as plain ffs (in my test of
> writing 1000 files of size 512, msdosfs is actually only 5 times slower
> than ffs with soft updates or async; plain ffs is about 7.5 times slower).

mtools feels faster (yes, no measurement, pure subjective observation).

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
   If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
                ...Oh, wait a minute, he already does.

http://www.Leidinger.net                       Alexander @ Leidinger.net
  GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91  3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to