As the person who broke it I'd like to help.. The problem was that it referenced teh proc structure all over the place in several different ways, and it was not obvious, without knowing the protocol which should become thread references and which should stay proc references.
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 5:23 PM -0500 2002/11/21, Robert Watson wrote: > > > (And, you have to bring your own test environment, as the second sentence > > suggests, but doesn't actually state). > > Over on -chat, we're in the process of putting together a list of > volunteers, hardware, organizational talent, etc... to help test out > -DP2. Mark Murray is involved, but I personally would like to see at > least one or two more core team members committed to making this > happen. > > If we can get a suitable group of people together, with suitable > hardware, and get the coordination effort done correctly, I believe > that we can help make this a much more successful project. > > > Your assistance in this effort would be greatly appreciated. > > -- > Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." > -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. > > GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w--- > O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) > tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++) > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
