In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" wrote: > >I never heard an answer to this: > > Did this test a "bug" fix; or should this maybe be committed into the > CVS repository for use by others with the same mobo I have?
This is always needed until the BIOS maker fix it and you replace with the bug-fixed version. >A stock 10-DEC-2002 10:00 PST kernel still does not give me a working >floppy drive. Should the latest ACPI import have fixed my problem? >Should a future ACPI code drop fix this problem, or will I forever have >to use a custom .AML with this motherboard? I don't think the problem will fixed in the future, because the problem is occured by the strict checking of byte-code validity. > If this mobo will always >require a custom .AML file I want to commit the one I have and start a >table of mobo/BIOS's and the custom .AML files we offer. You will need version information of the bytecode. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
