On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 04:05:31PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > or simply check out the newer sources. > > Looking at the commit you made, it doesn't seem to address the other > issues of the commit this thread is trying to avoid. > > I guess you're not going to honor mine and others request for a full > backout of the commit pending farther review and testing? firstly, I have seen no requests for backout (and even if I had, it wouldn't concern me because it wasn't my commit in the first place), and secondly, I have seen no tinderbox failures (becasue I don't seem to be getting the mails these days) so my commit was purely from code inspection. I have seen no firsthand complaints of problems and have only responded to look for problems because I heard via robert that there were rumours of failures on secontary architecures. If anyone has a real problem they might make it easier by emailing me with them so I have a clue what is going on. As for the testing, the code in question is 99.5% in KSE specific code and THAT has been tested pretty thoroughly. A backout is David's decision but My personal thought is that it would be a retrograde move. What we need is to see the problems. I haven't seen a single firsthand report of any problem yet. I think the mail system at FreeBSD.org may have had a flaky morning.. How about sending me a mail saying what the problem is and then we might be making some forward progress.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
