On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 04:38:53 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> 
> I think it's worthwhile to wait till we get a chance to try arc4random().

This is libc's rand/random, it can't be fixed with arc4random() as 
designed.

> Also, have you run the code you're proposing through the tests in the post
> that David Schultz just made?

This is fix form problem with 0, not for seed -> 1st value correlation.
I can't deal with two problems with same time, lets be sequental.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to