In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Takahashi Yoshihiro writes: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Cbus is to ISA as CardBus is to PCI in many ways. Cbus is very much >> like ISA in all but a few details. CardBus is pci with a few twists >> and turns that differ. If you look at how we've implemented cardbus, >> you'll see that we've tried to do it as a 'subclass' of the pci bus. >> We implement the PCI interfaces in the cardbus bus code, even though >> it is not really a pci bus. I'd propose that cbus implements the ISA >> interfaces in a similar manner. > >If my understanding is not a mistake, the CardBus specifications is >derived from the PCI. Therefore, I can understand that the cardbus >driver depend on the pci driver. But, the Cbus is NOT derived from >the ISA. So, I think that the cbus driver should not depend on the >isa driver.
This increasingly sounds like an emotional thing rather than a technical thing :-( -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
