On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:25:24AM -0500, Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using SCHED_ULE on my laptop now. My recent round of fixes seems to > have helped out. I'm getting good interactive performance. I'm doing the > following: > > nice -5'd for (;;) {} process. > make -j4 buildworld > > Mozilla, pine, irc, screen, vi, etc. > > All interactive tasks are very responsive. My nice -5'd looping process > is getting 70% of the cpu and my compile is taking the rest. nice +20 may > not behave as well as in sched_4bsd right now. I'm going to work on that. > > This is on a 2ghz laptop though so your mileage may vary. Use reports are > welcome. Much improved, can work while two [EMAIL PROTECTED] processes run at nice 19. Still takes more time to show directory listing (ls -la) compared to scheduler and the listing itself is a bit "jumpy". Scrolls about 20 lines, then waits for a moment, then scrolls forward again and so on. The stopping moments are actually very short, but noticeable. This is while the seti's are running, 2CPU PIII-500. -- Vallo Kallaste To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message