On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I've been getting a few of these on 5.0 lately:
>
> Mar 7 21:31:07 <kern.crit> bento kernel: failed to set signal flags properly for
> ast()
>
> Is there any additional debugging information I can provide to help
> track this down?
It wouldn't hurt to know the signal masks. This patch has rotted a bit:
%%%
Index: subr_trap.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/subr_trap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.239
diff -u -2 -r1.239 subr_trap.c
--- subr_trap.c 28 Dec 2002 01:23:07 -0000 1.239
+++ subr_trap.c 28 Dec 2002 05:32:51 -0000
@@ -73,7 +79,7 @@
u_int oticks;
{
- struct proc *p = td->td_proc;
- struct kse *ke = td->td_kse;
+ struct proc *p;
+ p = td->td_proc;
CTR3(KTR_SYSC, "userret: thread %p (pid %d, %s)", td, p->p_pid,
p->p_comm);
@@ -84,6 +90,16 @@
mtx_lock_spin(&sched_lock);
if (SIGPENDING(p) && ((p->p_sflag & PS_NEEDSIGCHK) == 0 ||
- (td->td_kse->ke_flags & KEF_ASTPENDING) == 0))
+ (td->td_kse->ke_flags & KEF_ASTPENDING) == 0)) {
printf("failed to set signal flags properly for ast()\n");
+ printf(
+"proc %s sig %#x %#x %#x %#x, mask %#x %#x %#x %#x, sigflag %d, astflag %d\n",
+ p->p_comm,
+ ((u_int *)&p->p_siglist)[0], ((u_int *)&p->p_siglist)[1],
+ ((u_int *)&p->p_siglist)[2], ((u_int *)&p->p_siglist)[3],
+ ((u_int *)&p->p_sigmask)[0], ((u_int *)&p->p_sigmask)[1],
+ ((u_int *)&p->p_sigmask)[2], ((u_int *)&p->p_sigmask)[3],
+ (p->p_sflag & PS_NEEDSIGCHK) != 0,
+ (td->td_kse->ke_flags & KEF_ASTPENDING) != 0);
+ }
mtx_unlock_spin(&sched_lock);
PROC_UNLOCK(p);
%%%
We really need to determine what didn't set the signal masks, but that is
difficult to determine from here.
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
