On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:04:07 +0100
Alexander Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We claim background fsck as a "cool new" feature in the release notes,
> which is even the DEFAULT, including WC on ATA disks, which is ALSO the
> default. So , and if this is broken, there is a serious design flaw,
> which must be fixed. It doesn't help to explain why the error is there,
> the next user will have the same error, running a verbatim system.
AFAIK: Søren had the WC off for a while on -current, but a lot of people
complained, so he switched it back on (I'm sure he regrets it every time
he is reminded about it). So -- including you and me -- there are at
least 3 committers which would like to see the WC turned off by default.
There are a lot of other people without special @FreeBSD.org privileges
which also don't like the actual default (if you can get a look at
iX-10/2002 read the "BSD-Softupdates vs. Linux-Journaling" article - the
tests for this article where done on SCSI hardware, but this doesn't
matter in this case - it explains the interactions of WC, TQ and SO and
how they affect the speed of some FS-operations).
Maybe we can gain some momentum and restore POLA (in this case the
default of going the safe way instead of the fast (but sometimes
dangerous) way).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Yes, I've heard of "decaf." What's your point?
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
